The Problem With Serialized Magic Cards
Magic is full of special treatments. Extended art, borderless, showcase, the list goes on. The newest of these treatments – and perhaps the most experimental – is the serialized run.
Serialized cards have been hanging around Collector Boosters for over a year now, having made their full set debut with
Outside the Norm
The results of this break from tradition were staggering. In all other cases, serialization was a significant multiplier for a card’s value, but not an astronomical increase.
This wasn’t an issue of artificial price inflation from top-heavy listing data, either. Going by TCGPlayer, the special issue serialized Praetors continue to sell in quantities akin to other popular, but significantly cheaper, serialized cards from the same set. People want cards that feel special, and this exclusivity did that.
This has been the most significant break from the norm by far, but it hasn’t been the only break. The One of One Ring aside, the next experiment with serialization came via a change in the amount of serialized cards produced in
Judging the effects of this change is difficult, considering that it was only applied to three distinct cards in an already specialty product, rather than a unique case in a broader set, but the overall data displays a simple trend: the Sol Rings printed with lower serialization counts are worth substantially more.
The next time we would see numerical norm breaking was with the release of the
The New Norm
Looking at more recent sets, such as the Lord of the Rings Holiday Release or
We’ve seen that reducing the number of serialized cards frequently increases their overall price – less is more in the collectibles world, afterall – but whether or not this rises to the same degree of prominence as what we saw experimented with via the Praetors in March of the Machine is yet to be seen. It certainly bodes well for the prices and excitement of serialization, but is it enough to make them the flagship collectible Wizards of the Coast wants them to be? I’m not so sure, and it all comes down to one card:
Chromatic Lantern has been serialized twice, each in XXX/500 runs, in essentially the same format. Now, I’ll yield that there are different arts between the two, but both use the same foiling, the same retro frame, and the only difference in art is that one is meant to be a schematic for the other. Some may hold fast to the position that these are different cards, but I can’t shake the sense that Wizards effectively doubled the serialization count for a card in what I can only toss up to a problem of poor foresight.
The logic behind serialized cards as a collectible is their uniqueness – its where their price strength comes from. Sure,
Wrap Up
This has certainly been a bit more of an alarmist take than I’m used to writing, but the coincidence of a card’s double serialization alongside the shrinkage of serialized numerations is enough to raise eyebrows regardless of what you think about Chromatic Lantern. At the very least, it seems counterproductive. Serialized-exclusives, like the Praetor artwork, have been far more successful in drawing attention to these singles than simply cutting print runs, so I’m doubtful that more of the same – just with smaller numbers in the art box – will make a massive wave in the sets to come. Something to look out for as a jump in serialized prices, perhaps? Sure. The dawn of recurring $1000 standard bulk mythics peeking out of Collector Boosters? I doubt it.
More Articles:
Harvey McGuinness is a student at Johns Hopkins University who has been playing Magic since the release of Return to Ravnica. After spending a few years in the Legacy arena bouncing between Miracles and other blue-white control shells, he now spends his time enjoying Magic through CEDH games and understanding the finance perspective. He also writes for the Commander's Herald.